Chad Perrin: SOB

30 March 2010

A “New” Motorcycle

Filed under: Miscellaneous — apotheon @ 04:45

A few weeks ago (three? four?), I put an end to a seven-year famine in my life. It has been seven years since I moved across the country and, as part of the move, sold my motorcycle to a friend (since I had no reasonable way to either transport or store it, and it wasn’t terribly valuable). This month, I got a new motorcycle.

The new bike is a 2000 Buell Blast. That’s the first year Buell made the Blast. Buell has been a subsidiary of Harley Davidson ever since HD bought the company in the ’90s, until HD closed down its Buell division last year “to focus on the Harley Davidson brand.” As you should be able to see from the pictures, a Buell is not a gigantic cruiser. Buell started out making racing bikes and their street-legal equivalents. The Blast was created for the express purpose of having a Harley Davidson built “starter bike” that was suitable to use in Harley Davidson motorcycle classes, so HD wouldn’t have to buy little Honda 250s for its own bike classes.

Of course, Harley Davidson’s idea of a “small starter bike” is somewhat different from what you’d expect out of a Japanese motorcycle company. The 2000 Blast is a 492cc single-cylinder engine. It’s a zippy thing, too. Best of all for my purposes, it’s about the closest thing you can get to a UJM these days.

Back in the ’80s, the major Japanese motorcycle companies all made a class of street bike that came to be known colloquially as the UJM, or Universal Japanese Motorcycle. A UJM was smaller than a touring bike. It did not recline like a cruiser, with the foot pegs out in front. It did not require the rider to fold his legs under himself to reach foot pegs that were high up the sides and back somewhat. Instead, the rider would just sit upright on a UJM with the foot pegs a comfortable distance pretty much straight down below his hips. My first motorcycle was a UJM, and I found it quite comfortable and well-suited to riding around town.

The Blast is built kind of like an old UJM, in that it’s not huge, it doesn’t recline, and it doesn’t “encourage” the rider to hunch forward over the tank all the time. Unlike the general run of UJMs (including my old XJ650 Midnight Maxim), the Blast doesn’t have a transverse mounted four cylinder engine — it has that single-cylinder pounder instead. It also has a somewhat smaller engine than my 650 had (about 150cc smaller), but it feels a lot more zippy and powerful, probably because my first motorcycle was in terrible shape. It was, in fact, in such bad shape that it rapidly became apparent it could prove downright dangerous, and as quickly as I fixed stuff, other stuff broke. My favorite was when I was pulling up to an intersection, squeezed the hand brake on the right handlebar, and got brake fluid squirted out of the reservoir across my hand.

I found out that day that it’s really difficult to stop a motorcycle using nothing but the engine and the soles of my boots. Thank goodness I had a really solid pair of sturdy motorcycle boots, and nobody drove through the space in the middle of the intersection where I managed to get the thing to stop.

The Blast, by contrast, is in excellent shape. It has been well-cared-for by owners who have loved and ridden motorcycles for decades, and used as an occasional fun ride, secondary to their primary motorcycles — cruisers (they were Harley guys). The man who sold it to me said he was getting too old and slow to handle this bike, and needed to sell it basically so he wouldn’t be tempted to ride it sometimes. He’s sticking to his touring-cruiser Harley now. He’s an awesome old life-long biker with a very impressive white beard and an infectious, laid-back, happy attitude. I should give him a call and let him know how much I’m enjoying the bike; I’m sure he’d be happy to know it’s in the hands of someone who appreciates it.

Life has been busy lately, which is basically why I haven’t been doing much (any) writing here at SOB lately. The motorcycle is actually one of the things that makes it more busy, though definitely among the least busy-making of those things, and among the most fun. Soon, I’ll be getting new boots for motorcycle riding (amazingly, I don’t have much in the way of good biking boots right now), and a new motorcycle jacket (not so amazingly, my old leather jacket is falling the hell apart — a zipper actually came apart in my hand recently). The SigO is going to get a helmet, both for times when she might be a passenger and as part of her plan to get a motorcycle endorsement on her driver’s license again (she lost hers moving to Colorado years ago).

Hopefully, within a year or so, she’ll have a motorcycle too. I’ll probably post pictures when the time comes.

note: Those pictures were from before I got the Blast. I haven’t changed much, but the license plate has certainly changed.

More Details Here

29 March 2010

another writing gig

Filed under: Geek,RPG,Writing — apotheon @ 10:45

In addition to being the primary name on TechRepublic’s IT Security column, I have another (semi-)regular writing gig now. I’m not on an actual schedule at Troll in the Corner, but the idea is for me to write as close to once a week there as I can reasonably manage amidst the rest of the doings in my already overburdened schedule.

As of today, my first article at Troll in the Corner has been published: Finding Inspiration for NPC Concepts. Hopefully you’ll like it as much as the enthusiastic first commenter did.

I have vague plans in mind about topics for other articles soon, including a stat block and description for a new critter, some stats and background for NPCs in support of a module, and maybe an overview of what niche Pathfinder RPG fills.

I’ve been kicking around the idea of starting up an RPG-focused Weblog of my own, but I don’t think I’d get around to it any time soon, and might not maintain any kind of writing schedule at all, so a gig writing for someone else will probably prompt me to write more often and has already prompted me to start writing much sooner than I probably otherwise would have started writing. So . . . there.

27 February 2010

editors who are wrong

Filed under: inanity,Writing — apotheon @ 08:45

I’d just like to say really quickly that I do in fact know when and how to use a semicolon. It is quite likely that, any time you may see a grammatical error of some sort (or misuse of the UNIX trademark or other such issues that are not strictly technical) in one of my article at TechRepublic, it was an editor altering my article prior to publication who introduced the error, and not me. The same goes for ambiguities of context introduced by formatting, such as when list items get turned into subsection headings (and, thus, the end of the list is no longer a visible end to anything when list items contain multiple paragraphs).

I can’t fucking stand it.

The incident that precipitated this comment from me is in one of my least interesting articles (in my opinion), Avoid ambiguity when referring to account names. The incident in question occurs with these words:

that value is greater than the cost of the added effort involved is difficult to answer in the general case; but for a person whose login information management procedures easily handle this behavior

This article was also a case of a list turning into a series of subsections, so that there’s now no point of differentiation between the last paragraph of the final list item (or subsection) and the first paragraph of the rest of the article. Argh.

Oh, well. It wasn’t really one of my best articles anyway. At least this time it wasn’t a great article turned into a mediocre article by someone else’s meddling.

The last time I tried talking to an editor there about introducing errors into my articles, it was about the UNIX trademark. UNIX is a trademark; Unix is not. Thus, when I say BSD Unix, I’m talking about the BSD branch of the Unix family of operating systems. When a TR editor changes that to BSD UNIX, the sentence now refers to . . . what? Some nonexistent Single UNIX Specification conforming and certified variant of BSD Unix that is called “BSD UNIX” . . . ? Who knows?

When I brought this up, I was basically told to keep my correctness to myself because that’s the way TR does it, has always done it, and will always do it. Since then, I’ve just quietly kept using terms correctly and, when people complained to me about misuse of the term UNIX, I have explained how the term got misused. That’s it. C’est la vie. The lesson I learned from that experience is that I shouldn’t argue about correctness with the editors, because they don’t care.

I won’t bother pointing out to them that “; but” is a sure sign you don’t know how to use a semicolon correctly.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

All original content Copyright Chad Perrin: Distributed under the terms of the Open Works License