Chad Perrin: SOB

18 March 2009

recommended books (fiction)

Filed under: Geek,Lists,RPG — apotheon @ 03:14

A friend asked me for a list of books he should read. Apparently, he has been reading them faster than he has accumulated them recently (the opposite of the problem I've had so far this year). I know he has read some of these, but since I'm posting it here, this list isn't just for him any longer. I decided to take the opportunity to post a list here, as an SOB entry. Like (most of?) my other list category entries, this one is subject to change in the future.

This list is limited to fiction — novels, in particular. I find that non-fiction book recommendations require a lot more specific tailoring to the recipient.

  • 1984 by George Orwell: It's one of the holy triumvirate of dystopian classics. It is not to be missed.

  • Anathem by Neal Stephenson: This alternate-world science fiction tome is a very challenging read. In my honest opinion, though, it is well worth it to anyone that is into challenging, philosophy-heavy, technically intricate science fiction novels. The inside of Stephenson's brain must be an amazing place to live.

  • Animal Farm by George Orwell: It's a dystopian classic every bit as good and essential as the "holy triumvirate", even if it doesn't usually get mentioned in the same breath.

  • Anthem by Ayn Rand: It's a dystopian classic every bit as good and essential as the "holy triumvirate", if far less well-known (and shunned by many because of their prejudicial attitudes toward Ayn Rand). It's also a very short, quick, and easy read.

  • Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand: It's huge. It has lots and lots of pages with lots and lots of words on them. It is a very long read. It's also quite good. I think the only people I've run into who thought it was poorly written (regardless of what they think of the ideas presented in the book) are people who thought Upton Sinclair's The Jungle was a good book. Anyone who likes that overwrought, self-satisfied, mind-bogglingly dull bucket of excrement is letting his or her political leanings supplant his or her ability to recognize quality of writing.

  • Brave New World by Aldous Huxley: It's one of the holy triumvirate of dystopian classics. It is not to be missed.

  • A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller, Jr: It's a post-apocalyptic science fiction classic at least superficially about monks whose purpose is to collect and protect accumulated knowledge that has survived catastrophe.

  • The Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger: It's one of those "coming of age" classics, with one major difference — it's good.

  • Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson: An amazing piece of kinda-right-now science fiction, basically the best representation of really impressive computer geek fiction I've ever seen, and definitive proof that Neal Stephenson is (probably) the best expositional fiction writer in the world. Usually, purely expository writing is a no-no for fiction, but Stephenson proves it doesn't always have to be a bad thing. Sometimes, it's an incredibly good thing — at least in his case.

  • Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick: The movie based on it, Bladerunner, is one of my favorite movies — maybe my favorite. This is also a book that's just too good to pass up. The two are, superficially, almost entirely unlike one another.

  • The Door Into Summer by Robert A. Heinlein: It's not one of the major classics, really. It's just a really well-written book.

  • Dune by Frank Herbert: It's one of the major, all-time, can't-miss science fiction classics. Each book following it in the Dune series is increasingly optional, in my opinion.

  • Elric of Melniboné by Michael Moorcock: As William Gibson is to science fiction, so Michael Moorcock is to swords and sorcery fantasy, and as Neuromancer is to cyberpunk, so this book is to postmodern fantasy. It's a classic, and the entire rest of the series is worth reading too.

  • Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card: This is one of the major, all-time, can't-miss science fiction classics. It is in some respects an interstellar war epic in disguise, but mostly it's an amazing exploration of a particular perspective on human nature. Each book following it in the Ender series is increasingly optional — Card seems to have lost the stomach for writing like he means it after he grew up. In fact, if you insist on reading the next two books, I recommend waiting a year or so between them, to help maintain the illusion that they aren't intended as sequels. Just pretend they're completely unrelated, and the next two books won't be so disappointing.

  • Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury: It's one of the holy triumvirate of dystopian classics. It is not to be missed.

  • Flatland by Edwin Abbot Abbot: As Isaac Asimov put it, this quirky bit of fiction is "The best introduction one can find into the manner of perceiving dimensions."

  • The Forever War by Joe Haldeman: It's one of the classic interstellar war epics, and does an amazing job of dealing with the difficulties of time dilation.

  • Ghost in the Shell by Masamune Shirow: It's a far-reaching story of cyborgs, artificial intelligence, and the meaning of being human. It's also illustrated — a manga, which is basically the Japanese way of saying something like "comic book" or "graphic novel". It's basically the best science fiction graphic novel I've ever seen, and one of the best science fiction books I've seen in general.

  • Grendel by John Gardner: A truly excellent tale as told from the point of view of the infamous monster of the Beowulf epic, it's worth the read.

  • The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood: It's a dystopian classic every bit as good and essential as the "holy triumvirate", even if it doesn't usually get mentioned in the same breath.

  • The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams: In a very strange way, this is one of the must-read, can't-miss science fiction classics, even though it's kind of a cross between a serious satire and a lunatic comedy lark in science fiction window dressing. Keep reading after the first book — read its sequel, and the next book, and the fourth book in the "trilogy". You should probably read the fifth, too, because it's also good, but I think the fourth book was the perfect end to the series, and it should have stopped there. Blame Adams' publishers, who wouldn't let him stop (he apparently didn't really like writing in the first place).

  • Illusions by Richard Bach: It's a touching, probably pseudo-true story of a man's journey toward enlightenment in the modern world. It's also an incredibly good book, though it's one of those things that requires a mind more open than average to enjoy it.

  • Jonathan Livingston Seagull by Richard Bach: This is a story of achievement and the power of belief told from the point of view of a seagull. Seriously. It's also kind of a classic.

  • Little Brother by Cory Doctorow: As I said in another SOB entry after I finished it, "This goes on the list of books every intelligent, thinking person should read." Go read that review for yourself if you want to know more. It's worth it.

  • The Little Prince by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry: A parable of clear thinking and the virtue of inquisitiveness, it's a short, easy read that nonetheless really gets into one's head and makes one think quite a lot.

  • Lord of the Flies by William Golding: It's a literary classic about a bunch of young boys stranded on an island. They develop rudimentary government, followed by political corruption, and finally war, in which they turn into a bunch of bloodthirsty savages trying to kill each other. It's an amazing piece of writing.

  • The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Robert A. Heinlein: This is pretty much the science fiction classic of a libertarian war of revolution between worlds.

  • Neuromancer by William Gibson: This is one of the key novels of the genre that has come to be known as "cyberpunk", by the guy who invented the word "cyberspace". In fact, I'd recommend every single novel he has written, pretty much in the order he wrote them. As an author, the man's amazing.

  • The Screwtape Letter by C. S. Lewis: An allegorical tale in the form of a collection of letters a senior demon sent to his nephew about the best ways to corrupt humans, it's just mind-bogglingly good stuff for anyone with an open enough mind to get past the subject matter.

  • Singularity Sky by Charles Stross: This is the only truly post-Singularity novel I've read, and it works by the simple expedient of basically being about the people the main thrust of the Singularity left behind. The core plot of the story focuses on the events of, and surrounding, a minor tech/economic singularity event on a world previously under the control of a backwards-looking, neo-luddite interstellar government, and features a couple of central characters who come from a more forward-looking world (post-Singularity Earth, to be precise). It is definitely worth reading for anyone that has any pretensions of, or potential for, interest in a potential Singularity in the future. For some, it will be kind of an interesting wake-up call, as regards the effects of disruptive technologies on backward economies (e.g., the current US economy, as well as almost everywhere else on Earth right now). For others, it will serve as kind of a litmus test — because if all the speculations in this book don't seem painfully obvious to people who have already considered the potential for Singularity in some depth, they're probably not going to survive a true Singularity when it comes, since they probably aren't going to be able to adjust to the far more drastic upsets that come along with it well enough to get by.

  • Starship Troopers by Robert A. Heinlein: One of the key science fiction classics of interstellar war

  • Strange Angels by Kathe Koja: It's just an amazing piece of writing, from the point of view of a guy who befriends a schizophrenic man. I've also read Koja's Skin, which is also well written, but the story didn't really grab me the same way.

  • V for Vendetta by Alan Moore: It's one of the unmissable classic graphic novels, about a revolutionary pseudo-madman fighting against an oppressive government.

  • Watchmen by Alan Moore: There's a satirical take on the common superheroes of the major comic book publishing companies going on here, but the story is about much, much more than that. This graphic novel was among the New York Times top 100 books of all time.

  • Watership Down by Richard Adams: It's about a bunch of bunny rabbits trying to find a safe place to live. It's rife with a rich mythological and cultural depth for the rabbits, the characters are engaging and well-developed, and the story is much, much darker than you might expect from the first sentence of this description.

I'll come up with more later. I'm still trying to decide whether to include collections of short stories here.

14 Comments

  1. I've read Animal Farm, Anthem (own it, too), I believe I've read Fahrenheit 451 but can't remember (I can't remember a lot of what I should be able to remember, so that's not saying much), and The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy (all four books).

    I need to read the rest.

    Comment by Joseph A Nagy Jr — 18 March 2009 @ 08:31

  2. I would dump the Ayn Rand and Jonathan Livingston Seagull as over-hyped piles of crap.

    However the rest of the list is full of cracking books. I read Brave New World recently and it is full of great ideas but the characters got on my tits. I would of happily seen all them killed off in painful manner.

    Comment by Chris Tregenza — 19 March 2009 @ 04:00

  3. Nice list. I've searched for a list like this for a while. Many books here that I've read and enjoyed, but just as many that I haven't. Most of the lists I run across have books on them that I did not enjoy, making me question the compatibility of my taste in books with the compiler's. I don't see that issue here. Thanks.

    Comment by Christopher Laney — 19 March 2009 @ 04:32

  4. Something I failed to mention earlier:

    I'm disappointed that nothing by Kurt Vonnegut Jr made the list. Seeing everything else on it, I would have liked to have seen at least Harrison Bergeron.

    Comment by Joseph A Nagy Jr — 19 March 2009 @ 04:53

  5. I liked Anathem, but the number of made-up words used instead of perfectly good English words got pretty annoying after a while.

    For my money, Snow Crash is the best of Neal Stephenson's works. It's a blend of cyberpunk and mythology that's just... stunning in its execution. The ending's a bit rushed, but that's common in Stephenson.

    The Diamond Age is also well worth reading.

    Comment by Scott — 19 March 2009 @ 08:34

  6. Chris Tregenza:

    Clearly, we have a difference of opinion here. Is there some specific reason for your dislike of Anthem and Seagull? What did you think of The Jungle?

    Christopher Laney:

    I'm glad the list suits your tastes so well, and thanks for reading and commenting.

    Joseph A. Nagy, Jr.:

    I've only read two Vonnegut books, as far as I recall. The most recent was The Sirens of Titan, and which I felt very "ho-hum" about. It read a bit like a cheap knock-off of some of Heinlein's less interesting works. It's also usually the only Vonnegut I remember I've read.

    The other, which I haven't read since about 1987, if not even longer ago, was Harrison Bergeron. It took me some thinking (and some discussion with my SigO) to even confirm that I had read it, lo these many moons ago. Once I realized I had read it, and that it's the book I thought it was when I started thinking I had read it, I realized that I liked it a lot back then. I added it to the list, based on my recollection of my reaction to it, though I don't really remember well enough how the story was written to give a very detailed recommendation. Thanks for the reminder.

    You should definitely read Fahrenheit 451. It's a must-read for every book lover.

    Scott:

    The "made-up words" in Anathem are sort of integral to the state of mind of the people in the novel. By absorbing them into my vocabulary, rather than just trying to remember some kind of correspondence to plain English words, I found that they stood out as distinct from any English counterparts and helped to enrich the meaning of the tale. Further, I think the subtle alienness of the new terms helped to highlight some of the processes of historical evolution of concepts that underlie the alternate world in which Anathem takes place.

    Science fiction has a long tradition of adding new terms to the English language, as these words are needed to describe things that don't yet exist — or, if they do, don't have a commonplace presence that demands colloquial terms of reference yet. That's how we got words like "cyberspace", after all. The difference in Anathem isn't so much that Stephenson invented a bunch of new words as that the words sometimes refer to things we'll never have, because they're relevant to an alternate culture rather than merely a future technology. I think a lot of habitual science fiction readers are thrown by that divergence from the usual way of doing things in science fiction, but for my part, it was brilliant and really helped to flesh out the story.

    I found Snow Crash to be a rollicking good time to read, if a little scattered-feeling. I also found the way he rolled ideas of ancient history and mythology into the plot fascinating, and the book made me think. I may still add it to my list, but I have to think about it, since I just don't think it was as good, and as full, an experience to read as either Anathem or Cryptonomicon. For me, the ideas in Snow Crash really stood out as spectacularly conceived, but judging by what I've read Stephenson doesn't seem to have really hit his storytelling stride until Cryptonomicon, thus leaving the presentation of those ideas in Snow Crash a little less than perfect.

    I just finished Diamond Age last night. I'll have to think about that one for a while before I decide whether to add it to the list, too. I have the Baroque Cycle on my to-read list (and they're all sitting on a shelf waiting for me, too) for some time in the coming months. I already know that Diamond Age confirms my opinion that Stephenson didn't really hit his storytelling stride until Cryptonomicon, though. I think Snow Crash may be the easiest read of the bunch, so far, but it wasn't until Cryptonomicon that his writing really completely absorbed me. With both that and Anathem, I found myself unable to put the thing down for hundreds of pages at a time, even at three or so in the morning.

    Thanks for commenting, and welcome to SOB.

    Comment by apotheon — 20 March 2009 @ 08:57

  7. [...] a comment from Scott Schimmel to yesterday's recommended books list, he expresses some disagreement with me [...]

    Pingback by Chad Perrin: SOB » a common difference of opinion about Neal Stephenson — 20 March 2009 @ 09:53

  8. Whoops. My SigO reminded me that Harrison Bergeron is actually a short story, not a book — so I've removed it from the list again.

    Comment by apotheon — 20 March 2009 @ 12:30

  9. Awww. Sad, but true. Definitely need a list for short stories then.

    Also, I have read Dune and Ender's Game. As a matter of fact, I've read the entire Dune trilogy.

    Comment by Joseph A Nagy Jr — 20 March 2009 @ 05:47

  10. Alas, I haven't read enough short stories (that I recall) to create a similar list. I might eventually decide to list a couple of short story anthologies, but I frankly don't recall more than a couple of them worth mentioning at the moment (Gibson's Burning Chrome and Doctorow's Overclocked spring to mind).

    I guess I just tend to read novels when it comes to fiction.

    Comment by apotheon — 21 March 2009 @ 12:35

  11. It looks like you have a great list there, i'd throw out a few... but unlike the gentleman above, i would not EVER think of throwing out anything by ayn rand. this woman knew her stuff. if you haven't read it already, i HIGHLY recommend We the Living. It is considerably shorter than atlas shrugged and the fountainhead, but it is a powerhouse.

    g.z

    Comment by Gorilla Zoe — 6 April 2009 @ 03:28

  12. [...] it's more action-packed and less thought provoking. Luckily, Singularity Sky (which made my list of recommended fiction books) was pretty thought provoking, so there was a lot of room for the sequel to have less depth without [...]

    Pingback by Chad Perrin: SOB » PPR: Iron Sunrise — 21 April 2009 @ 12:47

  13. Thanks so much for the list of books. I have been looking for something new to wet my appetite. If you like sorcery books you should read Forbidden: The Temptation. Samantha Sommersby’s Forbidden universe rocks with sexy vampires, wildly irreverent weres, and sassy kick-butt heroines.

    Comment by Kristen — 14 May 2009 @ 04:05

  14. Utopia should def. be added to this list sood list btw!~~

    Comment by Anonymous — 18 May 2009 @ 12:10

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

All original content Copyright Chad Perrin: Distributed under the terms of the Open Works License