Comments on: Apollo 1.0 — not exactly the moon http://sob.apotheon.org/?p=223 [ scion of backronymics ] Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:32:00 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: apotheon http://sob.apotheon.org/?p=223&cpage=1#comment-29907 apotheon Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:57:51 +0000 http://sob.apotheon.org/?p=223#comment-29907 Actually, no, I managed to miss (or forget) that detail. That's good news, actually. I knew Adobe factored into the development of Tamarin, and I seem to recall (now that you mention it) some connection with Flash, but I didn't know it was being used for Apollo. Actually, no, I managed to miss (or forget) that detail. That's good news, actually.

I knew Adobe factored into the development of Tamarin, and I seem to recall (now that you mention it) some connection with Flash, but I didn't know it was being used for Apollo.

]]> By: Rob Crowther http://sob.apotheon.org/?p=223&cpage=1#comment-29808 Rob Crowther Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:15:43 +0000 http://sob.apotheon.org/?p=223#comment-29808 You realise Tamarin is the <a href="http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/200611/110706Mozilla.html">ActionScript engine from Flash</a>, and, by extension, Apollo? Probably it will be possible to target both Apollo and Firefox 3.0 from the same codebase. You realise Tamarin is the ActionScript engine from Flash, and, by extension, Apollo? Probably it will be possible to target both Apollo and Firefox 3.0 from the same codebase.

]]>